The chip manufacturer Etched is reportedly in talks to raise money at a $20bn valuation. An unsurprising development in the world of AI.
What is surprising? These reports emerged while Etched was actively finalizing yet another round, at a valuation of only $10bn.
The sequence reminds me of Top Gun – of Maverick and Goose sauntering to their jet, high fiving over their “need for speed.”
While “speed” has numerous economic applications, I’m most intrigued by its derivative cousin, “acceleration” – for our purposes, what I’ll define as the shrinking interval between economic events.
Specifically, I’m interested in what happens when acceleration picks up, forcing new action before the last has fully played out –
– what we might call a “Maverick Moment,” riffing on the obvious intersection of Tom Cruise and Hyman Minsky. A moment when capital commits before cognition kicks in.
We’re generally taught to avoid this behavior. Just two weekends ago, the Journal ran a personal finance piece on sound money management with the subhead, “The key is to put a little friction between us and our purchases.”
Could the same extend to capital markets? Consider the following.
Speed: On a Friday, SpaceX goes public at a $1.8tn valuation. Acceleration: The following Tuesday, SpaceX uses its newly public equity to purchase Cursor in a $60bn all-stock deal. Outcome: Tuesday’s M&A currency has less than two business days of ground training before wheels up.
Currency that closed yesterday nearly 30% off its post-IPO peak.
Speed – in our case, large dollar transactions – isn’t inherently bad. If Etched sees an opportunity to raise capital, it should have at it. My brief stint as an investment banker notwithstanding, I’m grossly unqualified to judge.
But when acceleration forces the next decision before the feedback loop closes on the last, we may sacrifice sound judgment at the altar of rapid response.
We may find ourselves in a Maverick Moment.
And we know how that ended for Goose.
Discussion about this post
No posts


